Day 4 BEGINS

Well I'll state the obvious!!  I knew Michael wasn't acting suspicious, and was unwilling to change my vote because of it!  I believe we need to vote to lynch people who were vying for a Michael lynch.

I have to question you on that Stacie as Michael was the blocker, and would have become the killer once the two killers were out (had they been out before him). Therefore he did have a bad role and those pushing hard for them are less suspicious in my eyes (though not entirely looking innocent, just less so).

Hopefully we have some information that will be useful for us all. I think that it is great that the hacker finally was able to hit something (whether they didn't because of either inactivity or being blocked). I do think it is interesting that the first night without the blocker is the first that the hacker makes a move.

Not really sure yet where to start and I have to be up really early tomorrow so I'll be back tomorrow night

Stacie, you're absolutely nuts.  LOL.  I mean, I knew Michael was acting suspicious, and he WAS.  He was guilty.  There are three people the town needs to kill, in order to win.  We've already killed one.  First kill, was one of the bad guys! 

I am so happy my thoughts were correct.  Feels so good.  My theory was, Michael was hiding something.  He was.  We would've had to kill him sooner or later in order to win, so 1 down, 2 more to go.  But, I don't think Stacie is a killer.....just, off in her interpretations of what this game is and how it's played.

As for the killers not killing anyone again.....I dunno.  Is this some kinda odd strategy? I don't get it.

Seriously? 

I agree with Pete (and Amanda's comments), the killers wouldn't actively target the blocker.  Keeping the blocker would've been a good move for the killers.  If they were aware that Michael was the blocker, the smart move for them to make would've been to keep him.  Amanda's comment:

Quote :

Amanda
Unfortunately for the killers, they have lost the only protection that they had.

Quote :

Sasquatch 3 votes of 7 - Niki, Stacie, Kyle
Michael 7 votes of 7 - Henry, Shanna, Jeremy, Kiwi, Pete, Donna, Green Monster
Donna 1 vote of 7 - Sasquatch



Pending Votes: 1 
Michael,

Stacie, I can't understand why you'd want to go after the Michael voters.  Even though we didn't get a killer, we lynched the next best thing in the blocker.  Now we know that once we eliminate them, we won't have to worry about someone stepping into their place.  If anything, the Donna and Sasquatch votes are more suspicious than the Michael ones.  But of course, these opinions are coming from a Michael voter.

Well true..  I didn't read that he was the blocker.. guess I should read all of Amanda's post before I comment.  I just saw that he was not a killer and then made up my own assumptions..  that's my issue with speed/skim reading.  Good job Henry!

Well, really, nobody is innocent in my eyes  and I have to agree with what Jeremy said, but then again, I'm also a Michael-lyncher.

Let's not lie, I was clearly the most vocal about lynching Michael but... looky who was right... AGAIN! 
*triumphant dance*  

Michael was a baddie, probably the worst of them since our killers don't seem to be doing much of ANYTHING.

In my "I was right and nobody wanted to believe me" stupidity, I did forget that the actual BLOCKER is now gone, and this is the first time the hacker has actually done something. Thanks for pointing it out, Pete... I was a HUGE Sasquatch is the hacker fan... and while he may have actually came back and decided to be active since he was drawing so much attention, maybe we(I) was(were) wrong and maybe the hacker was just being blocked both rounds? I mean, Michael DID say that he was around for the night roles, so it's entirely possible that he blocked the same person two nights in a row, thinking the were a hacker since nothing happened the first night and was trying to protect a killer.

Don't really know what to think at the moment... I'm still a little in shock that there was yet again, no kill. Are the killers actually around? Are they inactive? is this strategy? Stupidity? lack of communication?

So much to discuss... but, it's almost 3am and I work early, so like Pete, I'll post more thoughts in the morning. I'm still in shock that there was no kill... my mind doesn't quiet know what to make of this move...

That sucks! I still think Sasquatch is suspicious. How do we know he is the Hacker? Would the killers know that Michael was a Blocker?

At the start of the game the blocker didn't know who the killers were and the killers didn't know who the blocker was.

Im sorry I havent been as involved as I typically am. I try to keep up to date with the boards but just havent had much time to wrap my brain around the details and post myself. Real life happens sometimes though, ya know? I should finally get some free time tonight and plan to go back through all 3-4 days and make my suspect list. Thanks for your patience.

Donna, we do not know that Sasquatch is the hacker. I personally feel there is absolutely no solid proof. I actually am in agreement that Sasquatch is still someone to watch out for, however I do think that we need to take some time to discuss everyone in the game not just one or two people.

I'm not gonna be on much tonight as I am so tired I'm not feeling too hot so not sure when I'll be on again, if it'll be tonight or tomorrow. Hope everyone is able to get on and start some serious discussions here!

I am still leaning toward believing that Sasquatch is the hacker, and did not send in his role.  But, now seeing that Michael was the blocker/replacement killer....I suppose he could've been blocking whomever the real hacker is?  Cause now that the blocker is dead, we get confirmation the hacker did something.  This could be coincidence, or it could not.  Ugh, this game has to many variables!  

Point is, yeah we've got 1 of 3 killers.  But there's still plenty of stuff to figure out and wiggle room for the remaining killers.   So you're right Pete, we'd better get something cracking......

*crickets*

After thinking about it, I'm still gunna stick with the whole 'Sasquatch is the hacker' idea from before. While it IS possible that Michael decided to block the same person twice in a row, there really wouldn't have been any way for him to know that the person he DID block was the hacker, especially when nobody really considered the notion that Sasquatch was the hacker until last round. I mean, he could have chosen the same person, but Michael is a smart guy and without any confirmation of the role of the person he was blocking, I just don't seem him blocking the same person twice with no real evidence.

I DO think that with all the pressure put on Sasquatch and the hacker for not being active, I think it's much more likely that Sasquatch chose to actually participate in the nightly role functions after skipping out on them for two rounds. He said himself that he was really busy and wasn't giving this game the attention he had intended to, so it just makes a lot more sense.

Then again, maybe I'm just falling into a trap or the killers secret plans. Who knows. I think a lot of people are acting rather suspicious, but so far none are screaming out like Michael did.

Anyway, I'm excited to hear what others think

I vote to lynch Shanna

Deadline for day 4
Monday, July 1st 11:59pm EST

Majority Needs 6 votes.

Votes: 
Shanna 1 vote of 6 - Kyle

Pending Votes: 10
Donna, Green Monster, Henry, Jeremy, Kiwi, Niki, Pete, Sasquatch, Shanna, Stacie

...Uh, okay?

Any particular reason you decided to throw a vote in my direction, Kyle? Honestly, I'd just LOVE to know. Then again, you haven't really given any reasons for any of your very few actions this game, so I guess I shouldn't take it personal. Ah, who am I kidding here!

I vote to lynch Kyle.

I think your behaviour has been a crap load more suspicious than mine, but then again, I'm slightly bias there. Since we're in the non-sharing mood, I'll stop there... but... seriously? After being inactive for the majority of the game, you come out of your little shell and vote to lynch me, giving no reasons?

Grow a back bone...

I vote to lych Shanna still

I vote to lynch Kyle still....

Deadline for day 4
Monday, July 1st 11:59pm EST

Majority Needs 6 votes.

Votes: 
Shanna 1 vote of 6 - Kyle
Kyle 1 vote of 6 - Shanna


Pending Votes: 9
Donna, Green Monster, Henry, Jeremy, Kiwi, Niki, Pete, Sasquatch, Stacie

Well, I suppose we will have to see how it goes from here. We will truly see if you are God's gift to mafia as you claim. *nanner dance*

Okay

All jokes aside, I think Niki and Jeremy are the two killers, Madness!!!!!!

WAKE UP KIWI

All jokes aside... more people should be up at 3am on their computers, especially when they work in the morning  

Nah, this is cool

They cant react as quickly when they are baddies. they have to make sure not to contradict ,etc,etc